"Strive for excellence, settle for perfection." -A Cortez
soulchow.
12/09/2012
majority rules!
In yesterday's English class, we were presented with a dilemma indifferent to other circumstances: would you sacrifice the life of one person in place of many? Whichever context this may be found in, most people (if not everyone) would adopt a utilitarian perspective. It is a selfish act to choose a lesser number over a great one, unless you are affected by personal factors such as familiar relationships, etc.
Literature provides great examples of conflict in which morality is questioned, such as The Quiet American by Graham Greene. Based on the first Vietnam War, the character of Pyle attempts to resolve the conflict between the French and the Vietminh by creating a "Third Force". Heavily influenced by the musings of his literary idol York Harding, he believes that radical movements (such as bombing of Rue Catinat) is worth the price of the 'greater good'.
The character of Fowler, on the other hand, chooses to be degage- a term meaning detached -as a reporter for a British journal. This choice prevents him from having to make extreme and personal decisions (which he then later on has to make).
Literature provides great examples of conflict in which morality is questioned, such as The Quiet American by Graham Greene. Based on the first Vietnam War, the character of Pyle attempts to resolve the conflict between the French and the Vietminh by creating a "Third Force". Heavily influenced by the musings of his literary idol York Harding, he believes that radical movements (such as bombing of Rue Catinat) is worth the price of the 'greater good'.
The character of Fowler, on the other hand, chooses to be degage- a term meaning detached -as a reporter for a British journal. This choice prevents him from having to make extreme and personal decisions (which he then later on has to make).
"One has to take sides...if you are to remain human" -Mr HengFinding out about Pyle's idealistic plots, his neutrality comes at an end by setting up his murder. In doing so, he had not only condemn Pyle to death, but had also taken away Phuong (woman of the love triangle)'s chance at a 'normal' life with Pyle. But is it really worth hurting one person (and killing another) to save a greater nation from a radical revolution? Or did Fowler also break his morality by killing one person for 'the greater good', just as Pyle did with the bombings (for the better Vietnam)? What do you guys think? :)
appetiser
Hi everyone! My name is Thor Cortez, I'm 18 years old and just about to finish high school. More about myself, I love everything artsy... mind you, I like sport and other non-art related things, but what I love about the arts is how you are able to express yourself through them, and in a way, share yourself with other people. So corny huh?
I love music: The Script, James Morrison, etc.
I love drama: Catherine Zeta-Jones is my fav!
I am also an amateur designer... after all, I want to study Advertising/Media in Uni.
Here is a video of me during a Showcase Concert at school:
Cute huh? No.
Anyway... that's all I'm saying about me, after all the name of the blog is "soulchow" for a reason right? That's because everything on here will be food for thought, dessert for the mind as I like to call it. Keep your minds sharp!
"The sharp thorn often produces delicate roses" -Ovid
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)